Last week, I compared A Secret Garden to my favorite fairy tale, Beauty and the Beast. The subject of this week’s Classics Club post, A Little Princess by Frances Hodgson Burnett, has fairy tale elements which are even more obvious.
It’s pretty much the exact same story as Cinderella — an only child whose sweet disposition is unaffected by being spoiled is left in the care of an unkind woman after her father’s unexpected death. The austere and jealous guardian transforms the girl into a servant who lives in an attic and makes friends with rodents and birds. Eventually, a wealthy man swoops in and rescues her (Tweet about it).
There are even jealous “step-sister” figures in the form of some of the girls at the school (we’re looking at you, Lavinia). And you could call Ram Dass a “fairy godmother” of sorts, since he transforms Sara’s dingy attic into a princess room simply because he notices she’s so kind and wants to do something nice for her. It’s a key fairy-tale trope — eventually Magic (or it’s human equivalent) will step in and set things right if only you’re a good person.
Sara’s disposition throughout her enslavement could have stepped right out of the latest Cinderella film. Sara and Ella have different personalities (Sara is a young INFP, and I’ve typed Ella as an ISFJ), but they react in much the same way. They commit to making the best of a situation they can’t get out of and maintain their courage and dignity in the face of people who would try anyone’s patience.
Well, I take that back about situations they can’t get out of. Sara can’t escape by herself because of how young she is, but Ella could have left if she wasn’t so committed to the house as her parent’s legacy. That’s one of the things I’ve seen people complain about when discussing the new Cinderella film — that she’s to passive. I don’t think Sara would have been like that once she was grown. She probably would have applied for different teaching positions or tried to find work as a governess. And that’s making me think of Jane Eyre again for the second blog post in two weeks (maybe I should re-read that one, too).
I’ve enjoyed re-reading these two classics from my childhood. Up will now, all the reads from My Classics Club Book List have been new to me. These shorter, easy-read books have also put me 2 books ahead of schedule for reading at least 55 books this year, which is an added bonus 😀
Click here to get a copy of A Little Princess. Please note that this is an affiliate link. This means that, at no additional cost to you, I will receive a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase.
I will always, always click on anything A Little Princess-related. Objectively speaking, it’s not a faultless book. But subjectively speaking, it’s the perfect book for me. There is no fictional character I adore more than Sara Crewe. I felt that Sara IS me. In reality, Sara is kinder, gentler, smarter, and tougher than I am. I wanna be like Sara someday.
Because I’ve always felt so connected to Sara, I’m surprised you pegged her as an INFP (I’m an INFJ). But after reading through descriptions of an INFPs, I think your categorization is accurate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really identify with Sara, too — living in her inner world, re-framing her circumstances to make reality better, using her imagination to help her treat everyone with graciousness (something I’m not as good at as her). My first thought was INFJ, too, but the more I thought about it the more INFP she seemed. It’s interesting how similar two types can be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sara Crewe is the first fictional character I have ever identified with when I was young. Maybe it was because she is portrayed as a tragic hero, and that gloominess mixed with resolve to do good in spite of it all really resonated with me
LikeLiked by 1 person
The criticism of Cinderella in the Lily James version (or indeed the earlier cartoon version) is unjust and wrongheaded. She has no training to do anything practical in the world other than being a maid and being a maid in a different household is hardly an improvement. She might be treated with less contempt but she would also be removed from her childhood home. The criticism (usually from feminists unfortunately) also ignores the psychological impact of what has happened to her and how hard it is to break free from such situations. It’s as stupid and glib as asking a victim of domestic violence why they don’t just leave.
LikeLike